LEMMO ONCOLOGYONCOLOGY • PATIENT CARE • RESEARCH

Scientific Publications

Integrative Oncology Research | Clinical Case Reports | Scientific Commentary

Dr. Walter Lemmo’s published work reflects his longstanding interest in integrative oncology, cancer treatment interactions, investigational therapeutic approaches and evidence-informed clinical practice.

His scholarly contributions include peer-reviewed journal publications, clinical case reports, professional articles and scientific commentary.

Recent Publications & Commentary — 2026

Micronized Progesterone in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Two Integrative Naturopathic Oncology Case Reports

Walter Lemmo, ND, FABNO
Naturopathic Doctor News & Review (NDNR) — September 2026

This article presents two clinical cases involving advanced or recurrent high-risk endometrial cancer in which micronized progesterone was incorporated primarily for sleep and quality-of-life support alongside broader oncology care.

The cases explore questions concerning hormonal mechanisms, supportive care and potential directions for further research. As observational reports involving multiple therapies, they do not establish an independent anticancer effect of micronized progesterone.

Read the full article

Critical Issues With Recent CAM Survival Cohort Study

Dugald Seely, Paul S. Anderson, Ian D. Bier, Walter Lemmo and Davis Lamson

JAMA Network Open — Online Scholarly Commentary, March 25, 2026

This co-authored commentary responds to research examining complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with breast cancer.

The authors discuss methodological concerns involving identification of complementary medicine users, potential exposure misclassification and interpretation of observational survival findings.

The commentary highlights the importance of accurate research methodology when evaluating integrative oncology.

Read the JAMA commentary

Peer-Reviewed Research & Clinical Case Reports

Anti-Estrogen Withdrawal Effect With Raloxifene? A Case Report

Walter Lemmo

Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2016;15(3):245–249.

DOI: 10.1177/1534735416658954

This case report describes clinical observations following raloxifene withdrawal in a patient with metastatic hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer.

The report discusses possible hormonal withdrawal mechanisms and their relevance to further investigation.

Read on PubMed

Prolonged Survival After Dichloroacetate Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma-Related Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis

Walter Lemmo and Gerard Tan

Journal of Medical Cases. 2016;7(4):136–142.

DOI: 10.14740/jmc2456w

This observational case report describes the clinical course of a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer complicated by leptomeningeal carcinomatosis who received investigational dichloroacetate.

The report discusses prolonged survival and possible research implications. A single case cannot establish the efficacy or safety of dichloroacetate as an anticancer treatment.

Read the published report

Potential Interactions of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medications Having Antioxidant Capabilities With Radiation and Chemotherapy

Walter Lemmo

International Journal of Cancer. 2015;137(11):2525–2533.

DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29208

This review examines potential interactions between the antioxidant properties of commonly used prescription and nonprescription medications and conventional cancer treatments.

It explores considerations relevant to pharmacological interactions, radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

Read on PubMed

Research and Professional Collaboration

Dr. Walter Lemmo, NMD, FABNO, serves as Director of Clinical Research at Sunridge Medical in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Through LEMMO Oncology, his professional interests include advancing scientific discussion, evaluating emerging evidence and exploring opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration in integrative oncology.

Learn more about Dr. Lemmo at Sunridge Medical


Research information: Publications and clinical case reports are presented for scientific and educational purposes. Observational findings should be interpreted according to their methodological limitations and should not be taken as proof of treatment effectiveness.